THE EULA is also presented to the point where users can download the software or app, as King does here in his Apple App Store: An end-user license agreement allows you to revoke an end user`s license at any time. You can do this if the end user violates the rules set out in the agreement. Since there are so many similarities between the EULA and the terms and conditions of sale, just review the general clauses that you will find in the two agreements and highlight the similarities and differences as we leave. When your user downloads, installs and uses a copy of your app on their personal device, they create a copy of your software that is a copyrighted work. Compare it to Ubisoft`s jurisdiction clause – you`ll find that it`s broader and covers not only the software license, but also the services as a whole: on the other hand, a Terms of Use (ToS) document is a legal document that more broadly covers the expected behavior of users and the rules applicable to users when they use your software. In addition, software buyers should be aware that the licensee retains ownership of the license; As a general rule, the buyer rents or rents the software. In particular, in cases of software downloaded from the Internet, the licensee can have access to all the data entered with his software. This means that the supplier can read, share or sell it at any time. Pinterest also has an excellent clause to explain what the platform can do with the user`s content. Why is it great? Because it is summarized in a very simple language that makes it easier for the average user to understand: forms often prohibit reverse engineering to users. It can also make it more difficult to develop third-party software that collaborates with the software conceded, thereby increasing the value of the publisher`s solutions by reducing customer choice. In the United States, the provisions of the CLUE may prejudge engineering inversion rights, which are implied by fair dealing, c.f. Bowers v.

Baystate Technologies. But legal agreements for new companies that operate SaaS applications are still confusing for many people. Most retail software licenses reject (as far as local laws permit) any guarantee on the performance of the software and limit liability in case of damage to the purchase price of the software. One known case that confirmed such a disclaimer is Mortenson v. Timberline. All you really need is a simple clause, as Spotify uses it. This clause clearly states that the platform can only be used for “personal and non-commercial” purposes and those that comply with the terms and conditions of the agreement: Here is an example of a license contained in a license that is included in a license instead of an EULA in the Dropbox iOS application: this is broader than the offer of a software license , the terms and conditions of sale therefore cover much more information than an EULA.